Investor deck

Sonder City

A feature-length psychological drama — pitched here as a financing opportunity for Aural Vision.

This deck leads with the business case: what the film costs, what it returns, and why this team executes it. Keep it to 12–15 slides; investors skim.
02Logline

The one sentence that sells the film

Your logline

[Protagonist] must [want], but [obstacle] — in a story about [theme], set in [world].

One sentence, no more. This is what a sales agent repeats verbatim to a buyer. Write it last, after the synopsis, then cut it down.
03Synopsis

The story, in three paragraphs

Setup

Who we open on, what their life looks like before the story starts, what's missing.

Confrontation

What breaks the equilibrium, what the protagonist pursues, what stands in the way.

Resolution

Where it lands — without every plot beat. Enough to prove the ending earns the setup.

04Why now

The opportunity

Market context

What audience appetite, cultural moment, or gap in the current slate this film answers. Cite recent comparable titles' performance if you have it.

Investors want a reason this genre/budget tier is fundable right now, not just that the story is good. Psychological dramas: point to recent festival-to-distribution paths (acquisition prices, streaming deals) for tonally similar films.
05Visual innovation

A proprietary visual technique, already built

Sonder City's central visual language — memory surfacing as a double exposure on the living face — is not a look-development idea. It's a working, camera-agnostic pipeline built in-house.

Face-tracked double exposure

A custom Blender pipeline tracks the actor's face per frame (MediaPipe landmark + depth data) and blends a second "memory" video onto it — either as a flat 2D composite or wrapped onto a real fitted 3D face mesh, so the memory reads as if it's surfacing from inside the skin, not pasted over it.

Analog degradation as emotional grammar

Eight compositor-level filters — diffusion, film halation, gate weave, flicker, lens breathing, vignette, local desaturation, chromatic aberration — combine into coordinated presets that encode emotional register directly into the image: warm/nostalgic, cold/ fractured, or gentle/hopeful, without a single line of dialogue.

This is a real technical moat: replicating this in a VFX house costs real budget and time. Framing it as "in-house, already de-risked" is a legitimate financing argument — the visual signature that makes this film distinct doesn't need to be invented on someone else's dime.
06Comparables

Where this sits in the market

FilmWhy it's comparableOutcome
[Comp title 1][tone / technique / budget similarity][acquisition price, box office, or streaming deal]
[Comp title 2][…][…]
[Comp title 3][…][…]
Three comps is enough. Pick films that sold or performed well, not just ones that are tonally similar — investors are pattern-matching on outcomes.
07Team

Who's making it

Director

Name, one credential or prior work that signals they can execute this.

Producer(s)

Name, prior production/financing track record.

Key crew / attached talent

DP, cast if attached, anyone whose name reduces perceived risk.

08Budget & ask

The numbers

$[ ]Total budget
$[ ]Financing ask
[ ]%Equity / recoupment offered
State the budget tier explicitly (micro/low/mid) — it tells the investor which comps and which distribution paths are realistic before they read further.
09Use of funds

Where the money goes

Category% of budget
Above-the-line (cast, director, producers)[ ]%
Production[ ]%
Post-production & grading[ ]%
Contingency[ ]%
10Timeline

Path to delivery

StageTarget date
Financing close[ ]
Pre-production[ ]
Principal photography[ ]
Post & delivery[ ]
Festival premiere target[ ]
11Distribution

Path to audience

Target festival tier → sales agent strategy → streaming/theatrical/hybrid intent. Name the realistic path for this budget tier, not the aspirational one.

Contact

Let's talk

Contact[ Name ]
Email[ email ]
CompanyAural Vision